Here you can ask questions and find or give answers to organizational, academic and other questions about studying computer science.

1.1k questions

1.3k answers

1.7k comments

557 users

Most popular tags

vrs vrs_exam vrs_exercise ltl exam ctl dira omega_automata rosy parallel_computing ltl_model_checking mbes processor_architecture zielonka sequent-calculus local-model-checking se1 lo2 automata bdd mu-calculus simplex temporal rosy_exam greatest-simulation zdd2fdd vrs_lecture kripke studiengang_reform bdd2fdd exists-algorithm tool fourier_motzkin equivalance bdd2zdd studiengangswechsel symbolic_computation ctl_model_checking fdd2bdd floating_point_arithmetic snf induction breakpoint simulation zdd curriculum_change fdd2zdd predicate_logic dynamic_scheduling cmd b_complement_multiplication constrain-algorithm compose-algorithm #parallel_computing minic i2sc format robdd acceptance curriculum_update basic_block_scheduling unit-tests finroc sche ddd2zdd zdd2bdd vrs_cheatsheet hrs infinite_path branch-bound pre-requisite thesis functional state-machine uml-diagram embedded-system ml1 registration pipeline_conflicts vector_computers actiontable modulo_scheduling static_scheduling organisation lo1 conditional #pram restrict ite programming compiler abacus scheduling parallel forall notation shannon important predecessors fdd

Categories

[DOUBT] Translation of omega automaton to LO2

0 votes

I have a small doubt about the solution provided in the paper of 2022. During the conversion of FG(p XOR q), wouldn't there be an -> operator instead of &? Can you please tell me if the below equation would be right:

in * TF "Emb. Sys. and Rob." by (510 points)
Why it got changed to implication?  In the formula of LO2 it is & operator I guess
by (100 points)

1 Answer

+1 vote
 
Best answer
Yes, you are right, that should be an implication, and it has now be fixed. Thank you for point out that mistake!
by (170k points)
selected by
Thanks for the verification. Glad it was helpful!
by (510 points)
In the formula of LO2 it is & operator, may I know why it got changed to implication?
by (410 points)

Related questions

0 votes
1 answer
Translation of Omega Automaton to LO2
asked Aug 24, 2022 in * TF "Emb. Sys. and Rob." by CS_E (2.9k points)
0 votes
1 answer
Translation of Omega Automaton to LO2
asked Aug 29, 2022 in * TF "Emb. Sys. and Rob." by CS_E (2.9k points)
+1 vote
1 answer
[DOUBT] Translation of temporal formula to LO2
asked Sep 3, 2022 in * TF "Emb. Sys. and Rob." by naik (510 points)
0 votes
1 answer
Doubt in LO2 to LTL
asked Aug 25, 2022 in * TF "Emb. Sys. and Rob." by CS_E (2.9k points)
 | Snow Theme by Q2A Market
Powered by Question2Answer
Imprint | Privacy Policy
...